| |
Chronic
Hepatitis C
Effects of dose reduction versus discontinuation on sustained virological
response
By
Diana Swift
NEW
ORLEANS, LA--Side
effects such as severe fatigue are dose-limiting in a significant
proportion of patients receiving pegylated interferon and ribavirin
for chronic hepatitis C. "During treatment, 20 to 40 per cent
may require a dose modification of either drug, and data from earlier
studies suggest that when you reduce the doses, the antiviral effect
may be diminished, said Mitchell L. Shiffman, MD, Chief of Hepatology,
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
However, the data stem from retrospective re-analyses of clinical
trials, in which investigators were unaware of the impact of dose
reduction before the trials were designed. "Furthermore, the
trials were not designed to evaluate the impact of dose reduction,
and the reductions were rigidly mandated by the study protocols.
Doses had to be reduced by fixed amounts and once you reduced a
dose, you could not go back up-all of which place significant limitations
on the data."
These early findings suggested that dose reduction or cessation
caused sustained virological response (SVR) to drop by roughly half-from
65 per cent for patients treated with the maximal dose of peginterferon
and ribavirin for 48 weeks to about 35 per cent. The first study
to point out the impact of dose reduction (McHutchison et al,
Gastroenterology 2002;123:1061) did not differentiate between
which drugs were reduced-one or the other or both- and whether the
medication was merely dose-reduced or stopped altogether. "As
a result, it wasn't clear whether dose reduction or the cessation
of treatment had the greater impact," Dr. Shiffman said.
More recent studies have tried to tease out the differences between
dose reduction and dose discontinuation. Data presented at the 2001
annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver
Diseases by Dr Peter Ferenci, MD, a Professor in the Department
of Internal Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria, show that dose
reduction does not impact SVR to as great an extent as dose discontinuation.
Patients with HCV genotype 1 who dose-reduced after they had achieved
an early virologic response had a decline in SVR of only about 10
percentage points, from 67 to 56 per cent. In contrast, those patients
who stopped treatment prematurely had an SVR of only seven per cent.
A similar relationship was observed for patients with HCV genotypes
2 and 3.
Most recently, data from the lead-in phase of the National Institute
of Health-sponsored HALT-C trial has evaluated the effects of discontinuing
ribavirin and peginterferon by various amounts and the timing of
when this dose reduction. The doses evaluated were more than 80
per cent of the starting dose, 80 to 60 per cent and less than 60
per cent of the starting dose. During the first 20 weeks of treatment,
a stepwise reduction in peginterferon and ribavirin was associated
with a stepwise decline in SVR from a maximal value of 21 per cent
to a minimum of 11 per cent. In contrast, dose reduction after week
20, when patients were already HCV RNA-negative had no impact on
SVR."These
data suggest that the dose of peginterferon or ribavirin could be
reduced in response to side effects that occur after week 20 without
impacting SVR." Dr. Shiffman said. However, this study did
not examine the effects of peginterferon and ribavirin independently.
As a result, it remains unclear if it is peginterferon dose reduction
or ribavirin dose reduction that is more important.
Some would argue that even with small reductions in dosage, SVR
is adversely affected and the patient fails to get the maximum benefit
of antiviral therapy. These individuals favour the use of hematologic
growth factors to mitigate dose-limiting side effects. Recent data,
however, suggest that the use of growth factors to prevent dose
reduction may not be necessary after Week 20 in patients who have
already achieved a virologic response. Supporting this observation
is McHutchison's study in which dose reduction after Week 12 reduced
SVR only slightly, from 62 per cent to 51 per cent.
The current obstacle in the U.S. to the use of a growth factor such
as erythropoietin-alfa is that this medication is not FDA-approved
for this indication, and requests to utilize this agent to correct
ribavirin-induced anemia is frequently denied. In some cases, the
physician may be allowed to utilize this agent on appeal, but by
then the hemoglobin has declined to the point that the dose of ribavirin
dose has already been reduced. At this point, the growth factor
may correct anemia and improve quality of life, but may have little
impact on SVR. No data have yet demonstrated that use of growth
factors to correct ribavirin-induced anemia can improve SVR.
Two recently published studies demonstrated that growth factors
can correct anemia, improve quality of life and symptoms of severe
fatigue (Dietrich et al, Am J Gastro 2003; Afdahl Gastroenterology
2004). Unfortunately, neither of these studies addresses whether
growth factors impact virologic response, and further investigation
is needed (the manufacturers of two growth factors are currently
planning new studies). "The current situation is a catch 22,"
Dr. Shiffman said. "By the time you do the end-runs necessary
to get approval for a growth factor, it may be too late to impact
what you want to impact."
|