CME
Meetings & Conferences
Products
National Medical Publications
Employment

Contact Us

   
   
   
 

Managing GI emergencies
Food impactions, ingestion of foreign objects and caustic substances

By Diana Swift

NEW ORLEANS, LA-With a prevalence of 16 cases per 100,000 of population, food impactions and foreign-body ingestions are a common GI emergency. "Though the majority resolve spontaneously, 10 to 20 per cent will require non-surgical interventions and one per cent will require surgery," Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD, said. From is a litigious area, he noted.


The ingestion of foreign objects occurs mainly in children aged six months to three years, but also affects adults with compromised mentation, mental retardation or inebriation, incarcerated individuals looking for special treatment, and people with decreased tactile sensation due to dental prosthetics, said Dr. Ginsberg, Associate Professor of Medicine and Director, Endoscopic Services, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.


While food impactions are sometimes due to underlying pathologies such as esophageal motility disorders, they usually strike either the "young and the restless"--those who gobble improperly chewed food while talking on cellphones--or the "old and the toothless"--those with compromised dentition or ill-fiiting dentures that inhibit mastication.
In people with normal anatomy, impactions occur in locations of physiologic narrowing and areas of acute articulation such as anastomatic sphincters, the hypopharynx, the upper esophageal sphincter, the pylorus, the duodenal sweap, the ileocecal valve, and the anorectum. In pathological anatomy, the most affected areas are Schatzki's ring, peptic strictures, esophageal webs, surgical anastomases, tumours and congenital malformations of the gut.
Objects are categorized as blunt (coins, small toys, bottle caps), long (pens, pencils, toothbrushes, cutlery), sharp and pointed (bones, toothpicks, razors, glass, dental bridgework), and miscellaneous (narcotic packs and disc batteries).


Food impactions are most commonly caused by meats such as chicken, beef, pork, and hot dogs (which contain fillers that plump up when they take in moisture). Another cause is vegetables cooked al dente. Starchy foods rarely cause impactions. Dr. Ginsberg has named a new impaction-risk scenario "Ginsberg's Triad": cocktails, conversation and finger food.


When taking histories from children and those with compromised mentation, the physician may have to rely on signs and symptoms of choking such as refusal to eat and respiratory distress. "Be sure to ask patients about previous episodes and the status of their dentition. Assess their mental status to see if you can trust the information they provide," he said, noting that one mental patient he treated volunteered that she had placed a spoon in her rectum but not that she had first broken it in two first. It is also important to establish whether there is airway compromise and risk of aspiration. "Such cases must be addressed immediately and may require anesthesia or intubation assistance from your ER staff."


The gastroenterologist must carefully examine the neck, looking for swelling, erythema, tenderness and crepitus. "You must assess whether perforation has already occurred before inserting the endoscope," he said. "And it is important to document that you have done all these things."


Most food impactions are radiopaque, with the exception of fish and chicken bones. Other exceptions to radiopacity are wood, plastic and glass. It is a wise practice to get biplanar radiographs of the head, neck and chest areas, said Dr. Ginsberg, referring to a patient who had ingested metal wire while eating pasta, but whose abnormality showed up only on the lateral X-ray view.


"There is no role for contrast studies in these patients. These absolutely increase the risk of aspiration because you are filling the esophagus with a column of contrast medium. And if a patient tells you he can't swallow his own secretions, you don't need this type of X-ray to prove there's an obstruction. It will only compromise your endoscopy."


After the history and physical exam, flexible endoscopy to locate the object is the first line of management, and the gastroenterologist must individualize the timing according to risk of aspiration and perforation and the location and duration of the obstruction. "There is an increased risk of morbidity and mortality once the objects go beyond the lower esophageal sphincter. So the golden rule is to use the endoscope sooner rather than later." There is no role for meat tenderizers, like papain, fizzies and carbonated beverages or motility agents.


Typically, patients can be sedated, and in those with a compromised airway or compromised mentation that may inhibit safe and effective sedation, there is a role for general anesthesia and intubation.
Dr. Ginsberg highly recommended taking a "dry dock" run and practising the extracorporeal retrieval of various foreign objects beforehand. Tools should include a variety of forceps such as the rat tooth and alligator type. There should also be graspers, snares, baskets and overtubes, aspiration vacuum cap and protector hoods. He noted that the esophagus does not easily release objects but grasps them tightly and is programmed to push them forward. Overtubes are effective for times when the physician needs to repeat insertions of the endoscope for food impactions or to remove sharp objects or long ones such as toothbrushes.


Most sharp objects will pass through the digestive tract spontaneously within a week, so weekly radiographs are a good idea. The exceptions are round objects at least 2.5 cm in diameter which have trouble clearing the pylorus, and long objects of more than 10 cm which have difficulty traversing the duodenal C-loop. "If you can do so safely, remove the object, but you have to embrace Chevalier Jackson's axiom: 'a leading point punctures; a trailing point does not.'"
In some cases the endoscopist will have to re-orient the object for proper grasping. "You don't need to do this at 2 a.m. You can make sure an emergency patient is stable and then do the procedure in the endoscopy unit the next morning with proper sedation and your best staff."


Dr. Ginsberg's advises clinicians to: inspect with endoscopy; note the location of the foreign body sensation; make sure the esophagus is clear of secretions; provide appropriate airway protection; and intubate if necessary. When feasible, it is best to try to steer around a food impaction and see what lies beyond, then gently nudge the morcilized food bolus into the stomach. "Do not blindly advance dilators past the narrowed area," he said. Patients with prior GI surgery are of special concern, and some patients may need an ENT specialist to do a laryringoscopy when objects are lodged at the level of the laryngopharynx.


In the miscellaneous category, the ingestion of disc-shaped batteries is increasingly common. These should be pushed from the esophagus into the stomach and retrieved. "As for narcotic packets, there is no role for endoscopy here; these require the attention of your surgical colleagues."


For objects lodged in the colorectum due to sexual assault or erotic misadventure, the gastroenterologist should attempt flexible endoscopy. "One trick here to eliminate the vacuum effect of a large foreign object is to place a chest tube or nasogastric tube up beyond it."


As for caustic substances, children most commonly ingest these. Acids cause coagulative necrosis and alkalis cause liquefaction necrosis. The most important thing in this situation is to manage the airway, breathing and circulation, which may involve resuscitation and support. "Call your regional poison centre and acknowledge that there is little you can do to reverse the extent of injury."


Endoscopy should be done in 24 to 48 hours to assess the degree of damage. Mild injury usually resolves spontaneously, while deep injury is apt to cause stricture and require dilation. Third-degree injury is likely to cause perforation. "Do not attempt to neutralize with mild acids or bases and do not attempt to intubate a necrotic laryngopharynx," Dr. Ginsberg said, adding that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of corticosteroids in these cases.

   
 

 

Return to Gastroenterology Canada index: