CME
Meetings & Conferences
Products
National Medical Publications
Employment

Contact Us

   
   
     
  Neurotoxin relieves pain of chronic
postherpetic neuralgia
  By Kathy Pearsall  
 

Vancouver, B.C.— Patients who suffer from the intractable, disabling pain of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) can get quick relief from a single injection of Botulinum toxin A, Kevin Smith, MD, told participants at Dermatology Update.


“This is a good example of how cosmetic dermatology gives back to general dermatology and general medicine,” said Dr. Smith, a Niagara Falls dermatologist.


He described a 73-year-old female patient with a three-year history of pain in the right forehead and scalp, in a V1 distribution. She identified 10 points in the involved area. After obtaining informed consent, and in particular pointing out that some brow ptosis would certainly occur following the procedure, Dr. Smith injected each of the 10 sites which the patient identified as painful in the area of PHN with five units of BOTOX THERAPEUTIC™, reconstituted at 100 units/mL.
“She experienced almost complete pain relief within one week and remained pain free at four months of follow-up.”


An 84-year-old male with a three-year history of intractable PHN in the left forehead (V1 distribution) received six injections of 7.5 units of BOTOX per site in painful areas he identified in the left V1 distribution. He had considerable improvement in most of the V1 distribution within a week, except in the area of a scar where a large basal cell carcinoma had been excised and covered with a flap several years before. BOTOX treatment was very well tolerated, apart from the expected degree of brow ptosis that responded adequately, but not completely, to Iopidine (apraclonidine) 0.5% eyedrops tid prn.


“The area of persistent PHN is now restricted to the area of the surgical scar on the left forehead, and the other areas are almost completely asymptomatic. It’s been suggested that maybe there’s a neuroma or something else contributing to the pain in the surgical scar,” Dr. Smith said.


“Interestingly, his brow ptosis responded very well to Iopidine. Dr. Jean Carruthers recently suggested that it can also be used for brow ptosis in some cases, and, lo and behold, this patient’s brow ptosis got better within about one minute.”
Dr. Smith credited Drs. Arnold Klein of Beverley Hills and Rick Glogau of San Francisco for making the first (and so far, unpublished) observations about the utility of BOTOX for PHN.


Technique
The areas of maximal discomfort in the affected area are identified by the patient making an index fingernail mark at the exact sites, which are then marked with a fluorescent marker. The involved area with the marks is photographed, and the sites indicated by the patient are injected intradermally (where the majority of the nerve endings are located). Intradermal injection may also reduce unwanted muscle weakness, Dr. Smith said. Photography helps the dermatologist find the previous injection sites to either replicate a treatment or avoid doing something that may cause a problem.


Asked how BOTOX compares with gabapentin (Neurontin), Dr. Smith said gabapentin floods the whole body with drug and can produce a variety of side effects, including increased risk of falling in the elderly, whereas BOTOX treatment is precisely localized to the treated area.


“T the extent that BOTOX works for PHN, it may turn out to be a lots safer, more effictive, and less expensive than treatments like gabapentin. Only time will tell,” Dr. Smith said.
BOTOX may act in PHN and other painful conditions by modulating the release of the neuropeptides Substance-P and calcitonin gene-related peptide, and perhaps even by retrograde axonal transport along C-fibres, with effects on central glutamate release, he said. Dose ranging studies may be useful to optimize the ratio between pain reduction and unwanted muscle relaxation, he added.

 
  Back to Dermatology Times of Canada index